Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women. Show all posts
Thursday, December 2, 2010
5 tips for travelling while pregnant
Thursday, December 02, 2010 | 
Posted by
art_tatto_design_extremeBeing pregnant is a great feeling. Pregnant women’s feel very lucky to carry their beautiful child in their womb. For most women, who have started to undertaking in mood swings, would like to go on a holiday with their partner.
Traveling while pregnant can be unsafe if you take a few safety measures and keep it in mind to avoid dangers as far as possible while being pregnant. Here is the advice for pregnant women on traveling while pregnant.
- It is very significant not to travel after 36 weeks of pregnancy. Traveling while pregnant before the third semester will only boost the chances of miscarriage. It will also make you more level to motion sickness.
- Before traveling while pregnant, it is safer and better if you get yourself immune to deadly diseases which might be harmful to you and the child inside your womb.
- Most important advice for pregnant women is to keep drinking a lot of water, especially if you are roaming by flight. It is said that pregnant women get dried out when they fly due to less humidity level.
- Traveling while pregnant can make you feel troubled, so it is important to sit in a seat where you will feel relaxed. If you are traveling by air, book a seat where you have good place to extend your legs. If you are traveling by car, see to it that your legs are not cramp, good circulation of blood flow should be in the legs.
- When you are traveling for long distances and for hours and suggestion for pregnant women is to take normal intervals. Do not sit all the time, make sure that you take breaks to walk to the restroom or take a small walk after you eat something more. If you are traveling by car, stop the car for regular intervals and stretch your limbs for good circulation.
5 tips for travelling while pregnant
Being pregnant is a great feeling. Pregnant women’s feel very lucky to carry their beautiful child in their womb. For most women, who have started to undertaking in mood swings, would like to go on a holiday with their partner.
Traveling while pregnant can be unsafe if you take a few safety measures and keep it in mind to avoid dangers as far as possible while being pregnant. Here is the advice for pregnant women on traveling while pregnant.
- It is very significant not to travel after 36 weeks of pregnancy. Traveling while pregnant before the third semester will only boost the chances of miscarriage. It will also make you more level to motion sickness.
- Before traveling while pregnant, it is safer and better if you get yourself immune to deadly diseases which might be harmful to you and the child inside your womb.
- Most important advice for pregnant women is to keep drinking a lot of water, especially if you are roaming by flight. It is said that pregnant women get dried out when they fly due to less humidity level.
- Traveling while pregnant can make you feel troubled, so it is important to sit in a seat where you will feel relaxed. If you are traveling by air, book a seat where you have good place to extend your legs. If you are traveling by car, see to it that your legs are not cramp, good circulation of blood flow should be in the legs.
- When you are traveling for long distances and for hours and suggestion for pregnant women is to take normal intervals. Do not sit all the time, make sure that you take breaks to walk to the restroom or take a small walk after you eat something more. If you are traveling by car, stop the car for regular intervals and stretch your limbs for good circulation.
Friday, October 1, 2010
Most Americans untried With Sepsis, Survey Finds
The majority of Americans don't know what the life-threatening immune condition known as sepsis (or septic shock) is, according to a new review. The study results touch upon a serious illness that strikes a half million Americans each year and kills more than 200,000, but remains something of an enigma to the common public.
"The need of awareness and understanding is one of the major challenges we face in healthcare today," Dr. Kevin J. Tracey, president of the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, part of the North Shore-LIJ Health System in New York, said in a news release from the health system. "One in four hospital deaths are caused by sepsis, yet the majority of Americans have never even heard of the condition. Sepsis is a secrecy to most Americans."
Among the survey's additional findings:
- despite being particularly vulnerable, nearly 70 percent of adults 65 and older do not know what sepsis is;
- more men than women (63 percent versus 55 percent) are unfamiliar with sepsis, even though men have a higher mortality rate when affected;
- blacks are less familiar with the condition than whites and Hispanics (67 percent versus 58 percent), despite a higher incidence among blacks.
Most Americans untried With Sepsis, Survey Finds
The majority of Americans don't know what the life-threatening immune condition known as sepsis (or septic shock) is, according to a new review. The study results touch upon a serious illness that strikes a half million Americans each year and kills more than 200,000, but remains something of an enigma to the common public.
"The need of awareness and understanding is one of the major challenges we face in healthcare today," Dr. Kevin J. Tracey, president of the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, part of the North Shore-LIJ Health System in New York, said in a news release from the health system. "One in four hospital deaths are caused by sepsis, yet the majority of Americans have never even heard of the condition. Sepsis is a secrecy to most Americans."
Among the survey's additional findings:
- despite being particularly vulnerable, nearly 70 percent of adults 65 and older do not know what sepsis is;
- more men than women (63 percent versus 55 percent) are unfamiliar with sepsis, even though men have a higher mortality rate when affected;
- blacks are less familiar with the condition than whites and Hispanics (67 percent versus 58 percent), despite a higher incidence among blacks.
Friday, September 24, 2010
Breast Cancer Patients in Canada Drop With Decrease in HRT
A decline in breast cancer rates among postmenopausal women in Canada previous this decade coincided with a decrease in the use of hormone replacement therapy, a new study shows.
Researchers analyzed national data and found that "the nearly 10 percent drop in enveloping breast cancer rates coincided with the decline in use of hormone replacement therapy reported among Canadian women aged 50 to 69 years."
The largest decrease in hormone therapy occurred between 2002 and 2004, when use fell from 12.7 percent to 4.9 percent. During that same period, there was a 9.6 percent decline in breast cancer occurrence, said Prithwish De, of the Canadian Cancer Society, and colleagues.
Hormone therapy use decreased radically in several countries after the release in 2002 of a U.S. study that showed the health risks of hormone therapy outweighed the benefits. The researchers noted that breast cancer rates amongst postmenopausal women in Canada began to rise again in 2005. This may be further evidence of a connection between hormone therapy and breast cancer, they said.
"Such a return might be expected if [undetected] hormone-sensitive tumors were merely slowed by the withdrawal of hormone replacement therapy rather than prevented by it. If so, hormone substitute therapy may be thought to act as a promoter, rather than a cause of breast cancer," the researchers said in the release.
Researchers analyzed national data and found that "the nearly 10 percent drop in enveloping breast cancer rates coincided with the decline in use of hormone replacement therapy reported among Canadian women aged 50 to 69 years."
The largest decrease in hormone therapy occurred between 2002 and 2004, when use fell from 12.7 percent to 4.9 percent. During that same period, there was a 9.6 percent decline in breast cancer occurrence, said Prithwish De, of the Canadian Cancer Society, and colleagues.
Hormone therapy use decreased radically in several countries after the release in 2002 of a U.S. study that showed the health risks of hormone therapy outweighed the benefits. The researchers noted that breast cancer rates amongst postmenopausal women in Canada began to rise again in 2005. This may be further evidence of a connection between hormone therapy and breast cancer, they said.
"Such a return might be expected if [undetected] hormone-sensitive tumors were merely slowed by the withdrawal of hormone replacement therapy rather than prevented by it. If so, hormone substitute therapy may be thought to act as a promoter, rather than a cause of breast cancer," the researchers said in the release.
Breast Cancer Patients in Canada Drop With Decrease in HRT
A decline in breast cancer rates among postmenopausal women in Canada previous this decade coincided with a decrease in the use of hormone replacement therapy, a new study shows.
Researchers analyzed national data and found that "the nearly 10 percent drop in enveloping breast cancer rates coincided with the decline in use of hormone replacement therapy reported among Canadian women aged 50 to 69 years."
The largest decrease in hormone therapy occurred between 2002 and 2004, when use fell from 12.7 percent to 4.9 percent. During that same period, there was a 9.6 percent decline in breast cancer occurrence, said Prithwish De, of the Canadian Cancer Society, and colleagues.
Hormone therapy use decreased radically in several countries after the release in 2002 of a U.S. study that showed the health risks of hormone therapy outweighed the benefits. The researchers noted that breast cancer rates amongst postmenopausal women in Canada began to rise again in 2005. This may be further evidence of a connection between hormone therapy and breast cancer, they said.
"Such a return might be expected if [undetected] hormone-sensitive tumors were merely slowed by the withdrawal of hormone replacement therapy rather than prevented by it. If so, hormone substitute therapy may be thought to act as a promoter, rather than a cause of breast cancer," the researchers said in the release.
Researchers analyzed national data and found that "the nearly 10 percent drop in enveloping breast cancer rates coincided with the decline in use of hormone replacement therapy reported among Canadian women aged 50 to 69 years."
The largest decrease in hormone therapy occurred between 2002 and 2004, when use fell from 12.7 percent to 4.9 percent. During that same period, there was a 9.6 percent decline in breast cancer occurrence, said Prithwish De, of the Canadian Cancer Society, and colleagues.
Hormone therapy use decreased radically in several countries after the release in 2002 of a U.S. study that showed the health risks of hormone therapy outweighed the benefits. The researchers noted that breast cancer rates amongst postmenopausal women in Canada began to rise again in 2005. This may be further evidence of a connection between hormone therapy and breast cancer, they said.
"Such a return might be expected if [undetected] hormone-sensitive tumors were merely slowed by the withdrawal of hormone replacement therapy rather than prevented by it. If so, hormone substitute therapy may be thought to act as a promoter, rather than a cause of breast cancer," the researchers said in the release.
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
The ideal Ways For Women To find And Stay Fit
Fitness workouts can be extremely aggravating for women, especially when they see few if any results for their hard work. The truth is that there is no overnight "cure" for being unfit. It takes time, perseverance and effort to overcome.
The ideal Ways For Women To find And Stay Fit
Fitness workouts can be extremely aggravating for women, especially when they see few if any results for their hard work. The truth is that there is no overnight "cure" for being unfit. It takes time, perseverance and effort to overcome.
Thursday, September 9, 2010
2 Genes Have probable Link to Deadly Ovarian Cancer
Scientists say result s may lead to new therapies for ovarian clear cell carcinoma.
Mutations in two genes may be linked with one of the most deadly types of ovarian cancer, U.S. researchers have found.
In the study, researchers at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center looked for mutations in 18,000 protein-encoding genes in ovarian clear cell tumors from eight patients. The investigators starts 268 mutations in 253 genes, with an average of 20 mutations per tumor.
Further inquiry revealed that two genes ARID1A and PPP2R1A were more commonly mutated than other genes. ARID1A mutations were present in 57 percent of tumors while PPP2R1A mutations were present in 7.1 percent of tumors, according to the report available in the Sept. 8 online edition of Science Express.
ARID1A is a gene whose manufactured goods normally suppresses tumors. PPP2R1A is a gene that, when altered, helps turn normal cells into tumor cells. The genes had not previously been linked to ovarian cancer, the researchers explained in a rumor release from the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center.
The findings "may provide opportunities for developing new biomarkers and therapies that target those genes," Nickolas Papadopoulos, associate professor of oncology and director of Translational Genetics at the Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics & Therapeutics at the cancer center, said in the news release.
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma, which accounts for about 10 percent of cancers that start in cells on the surface of the ovaries, mainly affects women aged 40 to 80 and is opposed to to chemotherapy, according to background information in the news release.
2 Genes Have probable Link to Deadly Ovarian Cancer
Scientists say result s may lead to new therapies for ovarian clear cell carcinoma.
Mutations in two genes may be linked with one of the most deadly types of ovarian cancer, U.S. researchers have found.
In the study, researchers at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center looked for mutations in 18,000 protein-encoding genes in ovarian clear cell tumors from eight patients. The investigators starts 268 mutations in 253 genes, with an average of 20 mutations per tumor.
Further inquiry revealed that two genes ARID1A and PPP2R1A were more commonly mutated than other genes. ARID1A mutations were present in 57 percent of tumors while PPP2R1A mutations were present in 7.1 percent of tumors, according to the report available in the Sept. 8 online edition of Science Express.
ARID1A is a gene whose manufactured goods normally suppresses tumors. PPP2R1A is a gene that, when altered, helps turn normal cells into tumor cells. The genes had not previously been linked to ovarian cancer, the researchers explained in a rumor release from the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center.
The findings "may provide opportunities for developing new biomarkers and therapies that target those genes," Nickolas Papadopoulos, associate professor of oncology and director of Translational Genetics at the Ludwig Center for Cancer Genetics & Therapeutics at the cancer center, said in the news release.
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma, which accounts for about 10 percent of cancers that start in cells on the surface of the ovaries, mainly affects women aged 40 to 80 and is opposed to to chemotherapy, according to background information in the news release.
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Men Seem More delicate to Memory Problems Than Women
The New Study finds, Among elderly, rate of mild injury was 1.5 times higher in males. Elderly men are more likely to suffer memory problems than women, new research shows.
The study integrated 2,050 people, aged 70 to 89, in Olmsted County, Minn., who were interviewed about their memory and medical history, and who undergo testing of their memory and thinking skills.
Overall, nearly 14 percent of the participants had mild cognitive destruction (MCI), but the rate was 1.5 times higher in men (19 percent) than in women (14 percent). People with MCI have memory or thoughts problems that are more serious than what's associated with normal aging. Although not everyone who has MCI develops Alzheimer's disease, people with the impairment do often go on to develop it, according to the Alzheimer's Association.
The study, published in the Sept. 7 issue of the journal Neurology, also found that about 10 percent of the participants had dementia, and 76 percent had normal memory and view skills.
"This is the first study conducted among community-dwelling persons to find a higher occurrence of MCI in men," study author Dr. Ronald Petersen, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., said in an American Academy of Neurology news release.
"If these results are established in other studies, it may suggest that factors related to gender play a role in the disease. For example, men may skill cognitive decline earlier in life but more gradually, whereas women may transition from normal memory directly to dementia at a later age but more quickly," he added.
The study, funded by the U.S. National Institute on Aging and a Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's disease research program, also found that MCI was more common among people who had a lower level of education or who were never married.
The study integrated 2,050 people, aged 70 to 89, in Olmsted County, Minn., who were interviewed about their memory and medical history, and who undergo testing of their memory and thinking skills.
Overall, nearly 14 percent of the participants had mild cognitive destruction (MCI), but the rate was 1.5 times higher in men (19 percent) than in women (14 percent). People with MCI have memory or thoughts problems that are more serious than what's associated with normal aging. Although not everyone who has MCI develops Alzheimer's disease, people with the impairment do often go on to develop it, according to the Alzheimer's Association.
The study, published in the Sept. 7 issue of the journal Neurology, also found that about 10 percent of the participants had dementia, and 76 percent had normal memory and view skills.
"This is the first study conducted among community-dwelling persons to find a higher occurrence of MCI in men," study author Dr. Ronald Petersen, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., said in an American Academy of Neurology news release.
"If these results are established in other studies, it may suggest that factors related to gender play a role in the disease. For example, men may skill cognitive decline earlier in life but more gradually, whereas women may transition from normal memory directly to dementia at a later age but more quickly," he added.
The study, funded by the U.S. National Institute on Aging and a Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's disease research program, also found that MCI was more common among people who had a lower level of education or who were never married.
Men Seem More delicate to Memory Problems Than Women
The New Study finds, Among elderly, rate of mild injury was 1.5 times higher in males. Elderly men are more likely to suffer memory problems than women, new research shows.
The study integrated 2,050 people, aged 70 to 89, in Olmsted County, Minn., who were interviewed about their memory and medical history, and who undergo testing of their memory and thinking skills.
Overall, nearly 14 percent of the participants had mild cognitive destruction (MCI), but the rate was 1.5 times higher in men (19 percent) than in women (14 percent). People with MCI have memory or thoughts problems that are more serious than what's associated with normal aging. Although not everyone who has MCI develops Alzheimer's disease, people with the impairment do often go on to develop it, according to the Alzheimer's Association.
The study, published in the Sept. 7 issue of the journal Neurology, also found that about 10 percent of the participants had dementia, and 76 percent had normal memory and view skills.
"This is the first study conducted among community-dwelling persons to find a higher occurrence of MCI in men," study author Dr. Ronald Petersen, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., said in an American Academy of Neurology news release.
"If these results are established in other studies, it may suggest that factors related to gender play a role in the disease. For example, men may skill cognitive decline earlier in life but more gradually, whereas women may transition from normal memory directly to dementia at a later age but more quickly," he added.
The study, funded by the U.S. National Institute on Aging and a Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's disease research program, also found that MCI was more common among people who had a lower level of education or who were never married.
The study integrated 2,050 people, aged 70 to 89, in Olmsted County, Minn., who were interviewed about their memory and medical history, and who undergo testing of their memory and thinking skills.
Overall, nearly 14 percent of the participants had mild cognitive destruction (MCI), but the rate was 1.5 times higher in men (19 percent) than in women (14 percent). People with MCI have memory or thoughts problems that are more serious than what's associated with normal aging. Although not everyone who has MCI develops Alzheimer's disease, people with the impairment do often go on to develop it, according to the Alzheimer's Association.
The study, published in the Sept. 7 issue of the journal Neurology, also found that about 10 percent of the participants had dementia, and 76 percent had normal memory and view skills.
"This is the first study conducted among community-dwelling persons to find a higher occurrence of MCI in men," study author Dr. Ronald Petersen, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., said in an American Academy of Neurology news release.
"If these results are established in other studies, it may suggest that factors related to gender play a role in the disease. For example, men may skill cognitive decline earlier in life but more gradually, whereas women may transition from normal memory directly to dementia at a later age but more quickly," he added.
The study, funded by the U.S. National Institute on Aging and a Mayo Clinic Alzheimer's disease research program, also found that MCI was more common among people who had a lower level of education or who were never married.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
To Not Sleep, perhaps to Shorten Your Life
Shortchanging yourself on sleep could shave years off your life if you are a man.So claims a new study that establish men who reported having insomnia or who slept for short periods of time were much more likely to die over a 14-year period.
"Sleeplessness has potentially very severe side effects," said study co-author and sleep researcher Edward Bixler. "It wants to be treated, and more effort needs to be put into sorting out better treatments."
Female insomniacs could be suffer the same fate, but the researchers only followed them for 10 years and researchers didn't notice any significant difference in mortality rates.Previous research has looked at sleep's effects on life span, but the new study is unique because it takes into report both people's perceptions about how much sleep they're getting (which can be wrong) and the actual amount of sleep they got in a laboratory.
Bixler and his colleagues recruited more than 1,700 people from central Pennsylvania and followed the men (average age 50) for 14 years and the women (average age 47) for a decade. The participants answered questions and exhausted a night in a sleep laboratory.
The researchers report their findings in the Sept.1 issue of the magazine Sleep. About a fifth of the men died through the study period, while 5 percent of the women did. The difference may be because women live longer than men and the study followed women for a shorter period, said Bixler, a professor of psychiatry at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine.
Even after adjusting their statistics so they wouldn't be scared out of your wits off by factors such as the prevalence of sleep apnea, the researchers found that self-described male insomniacs who slept fewer than six hours in the sleep lab were several times more likely to die during the 14-year period compared to "good sleepers."
Among men, about 9 percent of "good sleepers" died during the study period, compared to more than half 51 percent of insomniacs with small sleep duration. As for women, they aren't in the clear, Bixler said. Since they live longer, it may take a study of a longer period to figure out whether they suffer from a similar effect, he noted.
And there's another complicating factor, said J. Todd Arnedt, director of the Behavioral Sleep Medicine Program at the University of Michigan. Whereas he said the study was "well-conducted," the men appear to have been sicker than the women, potentially throwing off the results.
"Sleeplessness has potentially very severe side effects," said study co-author and sleep researcher Edward Bixler. "It wants to be treated, and more effort needs to be put into sorting out better treatments."
Female insomniacs could be suffer the same fate, but the researchers only followed them for 10 years and researchers didn't notice any significant difference in mortality rates.Previous research has looked at sleep's effects on life span, but the new study is unique because it takes into report both people's perceptions about how much sleep they're getting (which can be wrong) and the actual amount of sleep they got in a laboratory.
Bixler and his colleagues recruited more than 1,700 people from central Pennsylvania and followed the men (average age 50) for 14 years and the women (average age 47) for a decade. The participants answered questions and exhausted a night in a sleep laboratory.
The researchers report their findings in the Sept.1 issue of the magazine Sleep. About a fifth of the men died through the study period, while 5 percent of the women did. The difference may be because women live longer than men and the study followed women for a shorter period, said Bixler, a professor of psychiatry at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine.
Even after adjusting their statistics so they wouldn't be scared out of your wits off by factors such as the prevalence of sleep apnea, the researchers found that self-described male insomniacs who slept fewer than six hours in the sleep lab were several times more likely to die during the 14-year period compared to "good sleepers."
Among men, about 9 percent of "good sleepers" died during the study period, compared to more than half 51 percent of insomniacs with small sleep duration. As for women, they aren't in the clear, Bixler said. Since they live longer, it may take a study of a longer period to figure out whether they suffer from a similar effect, he noted.
And there's another complicating factor, said J. Todd Arnedt, director of the Behavioral Sleep Medicine Program at the University of Michigan. Whereas he said the study was "well-conducted," the men appear to have been sicker than the women, potentially throwing off the results.
To Not Sleep, perhaps to Shorten Your Life
Shortchanging yourself on sleep could shave years off your life if you are a man.So claims a new study that establish men who reported having insomnia or who slept for short periods of time were much more likely to die over a 14-year period.
"Sleeplessness has potentially very severe side effects," said study co-author and sleep researcher Edward Bixler. "It wants to be treated, and more effort needs to be put into sorting out better treatments."
Female insomniacs could be suffer the same fate, but the researchers only followed them for 10 years and researchers didn't notice any significant difference in mortality rates.Previous research has looked at sleep's effects on life span, but the new study is unique because it takes into report both people's perceptions about how much sleep they're getting (which can be wrong) and the actual amount of sleep they got in a laboratory.
Bixler and his colleagues recruited more than 1,700 people from central Pennsylvania and followed the men (average age 50) for 14 years and the women (average age 47) for a decade. The participants answered questions and exhausted a night in a sleep laboratory.
The researchers report their findings in the Sept.1 issue of the magazine Sleep. About a fifth of the men died through the study period, while 5 percent of the women did. The difference may be because women live longer than men and the study followed women for a shorter period, said Bixler, a professor of psychiatry at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine.
Even after adjusting their statistics so they wouldn't be scared out of your wits off by factors such as the prevalence of sleep apnea, the researchers found that self-described male insomniacs who slept fewer than six hours in the sleep lab were several times more likely to die during the 14-year period compared to "good sleepers."
Among men, about 9 percent of "good sleepers" died during the study period, compared to more than half 51 percent of insomniacs with small sleep duration. As for women, they aren't in the clear, Bixler said. Since they live longer, it may take a study of a longer period to figure out whether they suffer from a similar effect, he noted.
And there's another complicating factor, said J. Todd Arnedt, director of the Behavioral Sleep Medicine Program at the University of Michigan. Whereas he said the study was "well-conducted," the men appear to have been sicker than the women, potentially throwing off the results.
"Sleeplessness has potentially very severe side effects," said study co-author and sleep researcher Edward Bixler. "It wants to be treated, and more effort needs to be put into sorting out better treatments."
Female insomniacs could be suffer the same fate, but the researchers only followed them for 10 years and researchers didn't notice any significant difference in mortality rates.Previous research has looked at sleep's effects on life span, but the new study is unique because it takes into report both people's perceptions about how much sleep they're getting (which can be wrong) and the actual amount of sleep they got in a laboratory.
Bixler and his colleagues recruited more than 1,700 people from central Pennsylvania and followed the men (average age 50) for 14 years and the women (average age 47) for a decade. The participants answered questions and exhausted a night in a sleep laboratory.
The researchers report their findings in the Sept.1 issue of the magazine Sleep. About a fifth of the men died through the study period, while 5 percent of the women did. The difference may be because women live longer than men and the study followed women for a shorter period, said Bixler, a professor of psychiatry at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine.
Even after adjusting their statistics so they wouldn't be scared out of your wits off by factors such as the prevalence of sleep apnea, the researchers found that self-described male insomniacs who slept fewer than six hours in the sleep lab were several times more likely to die during the 14-year period compared to "good sleepers."
Among men, about 9 percent of "good sleepers" died during the study period, compared to more than half 51 percent of insomniacs with small sleep duration. As for women, they aren't in the clear, Bixler said. Since they live longer, it may take a study of a longer period to figure out whether they suffer from a similar effect, he noted.
And there's another complicating factor, said J. Todd Arnedt, director of the Behavioral Sleep Medicine Program at the University of Michigan. Whereas he said the study was "well-conducted," the men appear to have been sicker than the women, potentially throwing off the results.
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Throat cancer rates rise in men
Throat cancer cases have soared by 50 per cent in men in the last 25 years due to fatness and bad diet, researchers have found. Back in the eighties approximately 2,600 men were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer every year but now the figure is more than 5,100.
The most theatrical rise was among men in their 50s, as rates increased by 67 per cent over the same period.
Rates in women also rose, but simply by eight per cent, from 5.1 to 5.5 per 100,000 people. “But we think the obesity outbreak may be a big reason behind the augment. We know that being overweight considerably increases the risk of adenocarcinoma – the main type of oesophageal cancer that’s on the up. Our shifting diets are also likely to be influencing the rise with people eating less fruit and vegetables."
In 1983, 9.6 in every 100,000 men were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer but now 14.4 in every 100,000 men are diagnosed with the disease – an enlarge of 50 per cent. Oesophageal cancer is the ninth most familiar cancer in the UK. In 2007, around 8,000 people were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer, counting 5,226 men.
The risk of rising the disease increases with age and affects very few people under 40. Oesophageal cancer is one of the most complicated cancers to detect and treat, with only eight per cent of people with the disease ongoing at least five years. Dr Lesley Walker, director of cancer information at Cancer Research UK, said: “These new figures are principally concerning as oesophageal cancer is a very difficult cancer to treat.
"Oesophageal cancer rates have risen considerably in the UK compared with many other Western countries so we need to determine the underlying causes.
"To struggle the poor survival rate for oesophageal cancer, Cancer Research UK is funding research to find new ways to identify the disease earlier and improve treatment so that more people beat the disease.”
The most theatrical rise was among men in their 50s, as rates increased by 67 per cent over the same period.
Rates in women also rose, but simply by eight per cent, from 5.1 to 5.5 per 100,000 people. “But we think the obesity outbreak may be a big reason behind the augment. We know that being overweight considerably increases the risk of adenocarcinoma – the main type of oesophageal cancer that’s on the up. Our shifting diets are also likely to be influencing the rise with people eating less fruit and vegetables."
In 1983, 9.6 in every 100,000 men were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer but now 14.4 in every 100,000 men are diagnosed with the disease – an enlarge of 50 per cent. Oesophageal cancer is the ninth most familiar cancer in the UK. In 2007, around 8,000 people were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer, counting 5,226 men.
The risk of rising the disease increases with age and affects very few people under 40. Oesophageal cancer is one of the most complicated cancers to detect and treat, with only eight per cent of people with the disease ongoing at least five years. Dr Lesley Walker, director of cancer information at Cancer Research UK, said: “These new figures are principally concerning as oesophageal cancer is a very difficult cancer to treat.
"Oesophageal cancer rates have risen considerably in the UK compared with many other Western countries so we need to determine the underlying causes.
"To struggle the poor survival rate for oesophageal cancer, Cancer Research UK is funding research to find new ways to identify the disease earlier and improve treatment so that more people beat the disease.”
Throat cancer rates rise in men
Throat cancer cases have soared by 50 per cent in men in the last 25 years due to fatness and bad diet, researchers have found. Back in the eighties approximately 2,600 men were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer every year but now the figure is more than 5,100.
The most theatrical rise was among men in their 50s, as rates increased by 67 per cent over the same period.
Rates in women also rose, but simply by eight per cent, from 5.1 to 5.5 per 100,000 people. “But we think the obesity outbreak may be a big reason behind the augment. We know that being overweight considerably increases the risk of adenocarcinoma – the main type of oesophageal cancer that’s on the up. Our shifting diets are also likely to be influencing the rise with people eating less fruit and vegetables."
In 1983, 9.6 in every 100,000 men were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer but now 14.4 in every 100,000 men are diagnosed with the disease – an enlarge of 50 per cent. Oesophageal cancer is the ninth most familiar cancer in the UK. In 2007, around 8,000 people were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer, counting 5,226 men.
The risk of rising the disease increases with age and affects very few people under 40. Oesophageal cancer is one of the most complicated cancers to detect and treat, with only eight per cent of people with the disease ongoing at least five years. Dr Lesley Walker, director of cancer information at Cancer Research UK, said: “These new figures are principally concerning as oesophageal cancer is a very difficult cancer to treat.
"Oesophageal cancer rates have risen considerably in the UK compared with many other Western countries so we need to determine the underlying causes.
"To struggle the poor survival rate for oesophageal cancer, Cancer Research UK is funding research to find new ways to identify the disease earlier and improve treatment so that more people beat the disease.”
The most theatrical rise was among men in their 50s, as rates increased by 67 per cent over the same period.
Rates in women also rose, but simply by eight per cent, from 5.1 to 5.5 per 100,000 people. “But we think the obesity outbreak may be a big reason behind the augment. We know that being overweight considerably increases the risk of adenocarcinoma – the main type of oesophageal cancer that’s on the up. Our shifting diets are also likely to be influencing the rise with people eating less fruit and vegetables."
In 1983, 9.6 in every 100,000 men were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer but now 14.4 in every 100,000 men are diagnosed with the disease – an enlarge of 50 per cent. Oesophageal cancer is the ninth most familiar cancer in the UK. In 2007, around 8,000 people were diagnosed with oesophageal cancer, counting 5,226 men.
The risk of rising the disease increases with age and affects very few people under 40. Oesophageal cancer is one of the most complicated cancers to detect and treat, with only eight per cent of people with the disease ongoing at least five years. Dr Lesley Walker, director of cancer information at Cancer Research UK, said: “These new figures are principally concerning as oesophageal cancer is a very difficult cancer to treat.
"Oesophageal cancer rates have risen considerably in the UK compared with many other Western countries so we need to determine the underlying causes.
"To struggle the poor survival rate for oesophageal cancer, Cancer Research UK is funding research to find new ways to identify the disease earlier and improve treatment so that more people beat the disease.”
Monday, August 23, 2010
Dark Chocolates May helps to prevent Heart Failure Risk
There are very few people in the world who don’t like chocolates, many parents stops their children for eating too much as this can spoil their teeth and this can’t be called a bad thing on behalf of parents but a latest study has shown how much sentimental is the small dark chocolate’s piece is for the heart.
A new Harvard study has recommended that eating a small portion of good quality dark chocolate for at least 2-3 times a month may help to beat the heart failure risk in women. So ladies this is good news for you as this is a established facts that majority of ladies are fans of chocolates.
While discussing about the results of this study senior study author Dr. Murray Mittleman said that “At least for women, burning up of chocolate seems to be linked with a decreased risk of heart failure, but the defensive effect was only seen with relatively small amounts of consumption, less than one serving a day”.
Linda Van Horn, immediate past chair of the American Heart Association’s Nutrition Committee and professor in the Department of Preventive Medicine at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, said that people must not misconstrue the results of this study and in a press release this statement came from her side “This is not an ‘eat all you want’ take-home message, rather it’s that eating a little dark chocolate can be healthy, as long as other adverse behaviors do not occur, such as weight gain or extreme intake of non-nutrient dense ‘empty’ calories”.
Thus we can say that people have got the freedom of eating chocolates but in firm limits.
A new Harvard study has recommended that eating a small portion of good quality dark chocolate for at least 2-3 times a month may help to beat the heart failure risk in women. So ladies this is good news for you as this is a established facts that majority of ladies are fans of chocolates.
While discussing about the results of this study senior study author Dr. Murray Mittleman said that “At least for women, burning up of chocolate seems to be linked with a decreased risk of heart failure, but the defensive effect was only seen with relatively small amounts of consumption, less than one serving a day”.
Linda Van Horn, immediate past chair of the American Heart Association’s Nutrition Committee and professor in the Department of Preventive Medicine at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, said that people must not misconstrue the results of this study and in a press release this statement came from her side “This is not an ‘eat all you want’ take-home message, rather it’s that eating a little dark chocolate can be healthy, as long as other adverse behaviors do not occur, such as weight gain or extreme intake of non-nutrient dense ‘empty’ calories”.
Thus we can say that people have got the freedom of eating chocolates but in firm limits.
Dark Chocolates May helps to prevent Heart Failure Risk
There are very few people in the world who don’t like chocolates, many parents stops their children for eating too much as this can spoil their teeth and this can’t be called a bad thing on behalf of parents but a latest study has shown how much sentimental is the small dark chocolate’s piece is for the heart.
A new Harvard study has recommended that eating a small portion of good quality dark chocolate for at least 2-3 times a month may help to beat the heart failure risk in women. So ladies this is good news for you as this is a established facts that majority of ladies are fans of chocolates.
While discussing about the results of this study senior study author Dr. Murray Mittleman said that “At least for women, burning up of chocolate seems to be linked with a decreased risk of heart failure, but the defensive effect was only seen with relatively small amounts of consumption, less than one serving a day”.
Linda Van Horn, immediate past chair of the American Heart Association’s Nutrition Committee and professor in the Department of Preventive Medicine at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, said that people must not misconstrue the results of this study and in a press release this statement came from her side “This is not an ‘eat all you want’ take-home message, rather it’s that eating a little dark chocolate can be healthy, as long as other adverse behaviors do not occur, such as weight gain or extreme intake of non-nutrient dense ‘empty’ calories”.
Thus we can say that people have got the freedom of eating chocolates but in firm limits.
A new Harvard study has recommended that eating a small portion of good quality dark chocolate for at least 2-3 times a month may help to beat the heart failure risk in women. So ladies this is good news for you as this is a established facts that majority of ladies are fans of chocolates.
While discussing about the results of this study senior study author Dr. Murray Mittleman said that “At least for women, burning up of chocolate seems to be linked with a decreased risk of heart failure, but the defensive effect was only seen with relatively small amounts of consumption, less than one serving a day”.
Linda Van Horn, immediate past chair of the American Heart Association’s Nutrition Committee and professor in the Department of Preventive Medicine at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, said that people must not misconstrue the results of this study and in a press release this statement came from her side “This is not an ‘eat all you want’ take-home message, rather it’s that eating a little dark chocolate can be healthy, as long as other adverse behaviors do not occur, such as weight gain or extreme intake of non-nutrient dense ‘empty’ calories”.
Thus we can say that people have got the freedom of eating chocolates but in firm limits.
Sunday, September 14, 2008
Super Omega 3, 6, 9; Why We Use Them
Borage Seed Oil:For more than 1500 years, the blue, star-shaped flowers of the borage plant have been used in elixirs and medicinal teas because of its healing properties. This natural oil is a rich source of gamma linolenic acid and has been known to be used in the treatment of eczema and rheumatoid arthritis and in herbal medicine. This oil is cold pressed from the seeds of the borage plant.
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Which are the best acne treatments? It depends! by Sarah Rhodes
For women it may be necessary to change some of the cosmetics you use daily ensuring that any foundations, blushes, eye shadow or moisturizers are oil free. It is best to look for products labeled noncomedogenic as these do not promote the formation of closed pores that cause the formation of spots and pimples. Even using these particular products some women may find their condition worsening. Additionally, it may be difficult to apply foundations during the first few weeks of treatment as the skin may become red or scaly, particularly with the use of topical tretinoin or benzoyl peroxide.
Herbs such as chamomile, lavender, juniper, bergamot, dandelion root, and burdock root can be used to reduce toxicity and improve the overall condition of the skin. Echinacea and poke root are often used for their anti-inflammatory properties and red clover may be beneficial for its estrogenic action. Witch hazel has excellent astringent properties and may be very effective on acne.
You might think that treating acne requires you to see and consult for prescription. Well, you can actually treat it by yourself! You can find solutions right in your home or garden! Applying toothpaste in your acne and letting it stay overnight is just one and actually the most common home treatment for acne most people do. You can also try a variety of paste or mask that are great options made from different plant species. You can choose from applying salt and vinegar solution, lime, ripe tomatoes, methi(fenugreek) leaves, lemon, dried basil leaves, mint juice, cucumber, corn flour and egg white, sandalwood, roasted and powdered pomgranate, ground radish, oatmeal, almond powder, honey, ground orange peel, nutmeg and milk, turmeric and tender neem, ground sesame seeds, papaya, and drumstick pods and leaves. Truly natural home treatments for acne!
There seems to be a growing number of different treatments but usually over the counter products come in the form of topical cleansers, soaps, washes, lotions, creams, gels or even pads and patches that are applied onto the skin. When using these kinds of preparations it is important, that you cover all of the area where you have acne because then you will also be treating the hidden blemishes that you can't yet see as well as the acne breakouts that you can. Expect some trials and errors as you experiment with the different treatments available, it may take you a while before you find the right type or combination of products that work for you. Whatever you do, don't use more than one treatment at a time, particularly with medicated products, discontinue one before you try out another.
Acne isn't really helped by the sun, either. Although a suntan can temporarily make acne look less severe, it won't help it go away permanently. So don't soak up those rays - either under the sun or from a tanning bed - in an effort to help your skin.
While laser skin resurfacing, Dermabrasion, and chemical peels are the most popular methods for acne scar removal, injection methods are also used. The injections may contain collagen, or fat taken from other parts of the body. While these injections work well, they do have to be repeated often, and they can be quite expensive. The injections do not actually remove or heal the scars - it simply hides them by filling them up.
About the Author
Sarah Rhodes suffered from severe acne for many years before finally discovering a cure that works. Read about Sarah and the secret that permanently cured her acne at: acnehomesolution.com
Herbs such as chamomile, lavender, juniper, bergamot, dandelion root, and burdock root can be used to reduce toxicity and improve the overall condition of the skin. Echinacea and poke root are often used for their anti-inflammatory properties and red clover may be beneficial for its estrogenic action. Witch hazel has excellent astringent properties and may be very effective on acne.
You might think that treating acne requires you to see and consult for prescription. Well, you can actually treat it by yourself! You can find solutions right in your home or garden! Applying toothpaste in your acne and letting it stay overnight is just one and actually the most common home treatment for acne most people do. You can also try a variety of paste or mask that are great options made from different plant species. You can choose from applying salt and vinegar solution, lime, ripe tomatoes, methi(fenugreek) leaves, lemon, dried basil leaves, mint juice, cucumber, corn flour and egg white, sandalwood, roasted and powdered pomgranate, ground radish, oatmeal, almond powder, honey, ground orange peel, nutmeg and milk, turmeric and tender neem, ground sesame seeds, papaya, and drumstick pods and leaves. Truly natural home treatments for acne!
There seems to be a growing number of different treatments but usually over the counter products come in the form of topical cleansers, soaps, washes, lotions, creams, gels or even pads and patches that are applied onto the skin. When using these kinds of preparations it is important, that you cover all of the area where you have acne because then you will also be treating the hidden blemishes that you can't yet see as well as the acne breakouts that you can. Expect some trials and errors as you experiment with the different treatments available, it may take you a while before you find the right type or combination of products that work for you. Whatever you do, don't use more than one treatment at a time, particularly with medicated products, discontinue one before you try out another.
Acne isn't really helped by the sun, either. Although a suntan can temporarily make acne look less severe, it won't help it go away permanently. So don't soak up those rays - either under the sun or from a tanning bed - in an effort to help your skin.
While laser skin resurfacing, Dermabrasion, and chemical peels are the most popular methods for acne scar removal, injection methods are also used. The injections may contain collagen, or fat taken from other parts of the body. While these injections work well, they do have to be repeated often, and they can be quite expensive. The injections do not actually remove or heal the scars - it simply hides them by filling them up.
About the Author
Sarah Rhodes suffered from severe acne for many years before finally discovering a cure that works. Read about Sarah and the secret that permanently cured her acne at: acnehomesolution.com
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
